Skip to content
Datadog vs Brizz

Datadog sees how your agent is running. Brizz makes it better.

Datadog monitors the issues in your agent runs. Brizz discovers the silent failures and your users' unmet needs, and fixes them for you by priority and impact.

Choose Brizz if you need…

  • What users ask for, turned into issues and actions
  • Issues across quality, performance, cost and usage
  • Success measured on every session
  • A focused list of what to fix first
  • A PR and a follow up for every issue it finds
01how each one works

How each improves your agent.

Datadog

LLM observability
  • Trace and evaluate your agent on one observability platform.

  • See what users ask about, grouped into topics.

  • Get cost and reliability Insights, each with a dedicated fix.

brizz

Agent evolution
  • Turn what users ask for into issues and actions.

  • Find issues across quality, performance, cost and usage, ranked by impact.

  • Get a PR for every issue, and a flag if it comes back.

02capabilities

Datadog and Brizz, side by side.

Capability
Datadog
brizz
FindWhat can be improved
Intents
◐
✓
Capability gap detection
◐
✓
Issues ranked by impact, with root cause
◐
✓
Shows which users and accounts struggle
◐
✓
Finds wasted spend
✓
✓
RankWhat to fix first
Agent Health Score
×
✓
Datadog: per-metric dashboards
Cost per issue and per user
◐
✓
Predicted future gain
◐
✓
FixA PR to approve, and its impact verified
Fixes delivered as pull requests
◐
✓
Datadog: for cost and reliability issues
Verify the impact of each fix
✓
✓
Datadog: for cost and reliability issues
ReadEvery interaction
Conversation as the unit of analysis
◐
✓
Metric calculation for every session
◐
✓
Tracing and evalsRuns, tests and prompts
Tracing, sessions and cost
✓
✓
Evals, datasets and experiments
✓
×
Prompt management
✓
◐
Full Partial Not offered

Source · Spotted something? Tell us at contact@brizz.ai

Datadog and Brizz, answered

For finding and fixing agent issues, yes. Brizz works on the agent: it finds what users need and what fails, ranks every issue by impact, opens each fix as a PR you approve and checks that it worked.

Insights finds recurring cost and reliability problems, gives a root cause, opens a PR through Fix with Bits, and resurfaces a problem that returns. Brizz runs that loop on everything it finds, including silent failures, capability gaps, slow answers and users who leave midway, and ranks it all by impact.

It does. Patterns groups your production traffic into topics, each with its volume, cost, errors, latency and eval results. Brizz turns what users ask for that the agent can't do into issues, ranks them on one Agent Health Score with what each costs, opens the PR, and flags the issue if it comes back.

It keeps reading the same runs after the merge, compares the week before and after on quality, cost and latency, and reopens the issue if it comes back.

See what Brizz finds in your agent.

Brizz finds what to fix in your agent, ranks it, solves it, and verifies the impact.

Integrates with the stack you already have